As I have said before, I'm trying to make 2013 the year of Mercenaries for me and so the faction is receiving all of my attention. While I've loved playing with Fiona in the past, I'm afraid that with the meta changing she's not quite able to keep up with the tools at her disposal right now, and so I've been looking for a new tournament caster to replace her. I've had lots of success with Connie so she'll be my first list tournament caster, but I'm in the market for a second. Consequently, I've started looking at Ashlynn D'Elyse again because her feat is kinda similar in effect to Fiona's but with an offensive component to it too, so I feel like her playstyle might be a little similar but a little more aggressive like Connie since Ashlynn is both difficult to assassinate and offensively scary for an opponent to deal with. Ashlynn will also compliment my Connie list well, where Connie will be great at dealing with a lot of Hordes lists with her volume of attacks, I'm going to build Ashlynn to deal with lots of high-ARM as I believe her feat and her spells allow her to deal with these types fairly well. Let's start by looking at her feat: Roulette.
Translate
Showing posts with label list building. Show all posts
Showing posts with label list building. Show all posts
Tuesday, April 09, 2013
List Building: Ashlynn D'Elyse
As I have said before, I'm trying to make 2013 the year of Mercenaries for me and so the faction is receiving all of my attention. While I've loved playing with Fiona in the past, I'm afraid that with the meta changing she's not quite able to keep up with the tools at her disposal right now, and so I've been looking for a new tournament caster to replace her. I've had lots of success with Connie so she'll be my first list tournament caster, but I'm in the market for a second. Consequently, I've started looking at Ashlynn D'Elyse again because her feat is kinda similar in effect to Fiona's but with an offensive component to it too, so I feel like her playstyle might be a little similar but a little more aggressive like Connie since Ashlynn is both difficult to assassinate and offensively scary for an opponent to deal with. Ashlynn will also compliment my Connie list well, where Connie will be great at dealing with a lot of Hordes lists with her volume of attacks, I'm going to build Ashlynn to deal with lots of high-ARM as I believe her feat and her spells allow her to deal with these types fairly well. Let's start by looking at her feat: Roulette.
Friday, March 01, 2013
List Building: Constance Blaze
I've been buying and collecting some models for the past 6 months but I have not done a lick of painting. Between school and planning for the wedding and new computer/video games, I've been so distracted from Warmachine/Hordes. I have been playing games, though, and even gotten some prize support at tournaments so I've been collecting models nonetheless. Yesterday I spent a good couple of hours putting some of these models together, followed by some list building. In the next couple of weeks I plan on sharing some of these list ideas as this year I want to focus on playing with Mercenaries! Today I want to share a list I created for using Constance Blaze as a mercenary warcaster and I have to say, I'm pretty amused by it. I will also share why I like taking the idea of taking Connie as a Mercenary warcaster instead of a Cygnarian one.
Saturday, December 01, 2012
Mercenaries? In a Tournament? With Character Restriction!?
My post earlier this week on Gorten got me to realize that I've always wondered how my Fiona list would do in a tournament setting. She's a fun warcaster and she brings some interesting tricks to the table that most people wouldn't be used to seeing all in one package. I like the list I have for her but there are a lot of specific synergies and I worry that any other 'competitive' Mercenary build would miss out on some of the elements I include in her list - most notably characters that I'd like to take with Broadsides Bart. Bart was never really a strong list for me anyway, and seeing as they're really the only two mercenary warcasters I owned, I didn't give tournament dreams much of a thought (Fiona is too time-consuming for Hardcore). Now, with Gorten, I can build two lists that I like but without the usual concerns about character restriction which will undoubtedly be in SR2013. So let's say I'm going to attend a SR2013 tournament, at 35 points. What lists would I actually bring?
Monday, November 19, 2012
Steamroller Prep: Escalation Tournament
So there's an Escalation Tournament on December 9th at The Battle Standard in Manchester, CT that sounds really interesting. Unfortunately, I'm on duty that weekend so I will be unable to attend *shakes fist* but in case I can get someone to switch duty weekends with me, I still would like to prepare for it. What will be interesting about the tournament is that there will be 4 rounds and the points values for each round increase, so you'll play at 15 points the first round, then 25, then 35, and lastly you'll play at 50 points. Where it gets most challenging, however, is that you must keep building on your previous list. In other words, the models in the 15 point list must be present in your 25 point list and so on. The other major challenge is that your 15 point list is warjack/warbeast only (although you can be 3 points down). That's where things get tricky because it means infantry warcasters will have a tougher time first round, and so the event as a whole will likely favor warjack/warbeast-heavy lists. So what would I be bringing? Well I first had to start with looking at viable 15 point lists, since those elements will carry forth into the later rounds. Here's what I considered:
Monday, October 22, 2012
Road to Templecon 2013: List Building
So we have confirmation that the Team Tournament at Templecon will be 2 lists, 50 points, and Divide and Conquer. Damn. This is also a bit strange to have such a decision already made without the SR 2013 document available yet, at least as far as I know... Either way, this is a little disappointing for me because it severely limits my options. One of the reasons why I was hoping for a 3 list format is it means that you'd be less likely to see the same tournament lists over and over again because players could experiment a bit more and worry less about bad match-ups. Indeed, I can almost guarantee that every Cryx player will bring Terminus, Cygnar players will bring eHaley, etc. *Sigh* Well, let's consider what I'll be bringing. At least the field will still look a bit different with the addition of colossals/gargantuans and there are a few new warcasters on the field these days, so maybe there will be some variety.
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
List Building: pKaya 35 - Griffon
It's been a long time since I've done some list building. Perhaps it's been because I've been extremely busy. More likely, it's because I don't have many opportunities to play games as it is and so I don't play around designing lists when I won't be able to test them. Today I want to share a list I came up with that I want to try with pKaya. I've always been an outspoken supporter of pKaya (and indeed, a lot of under-appreciated warlocks) and I think the recent release of the Griffon will allow a lot of flexibility for pKaya. Admittedly, with the recent errata ruling that medium bases cannot use their full range of power attacks against larger bases (throws, locks), the Griffon will have more limited usage in many lists, but I still think he's useful for an assassination tool - especially with pKaya. Let me share the list and then I'll break it down.
Saturday, August 25, 2012
Stryker's Replacement
I've been working on assembling the Woldwrath and I plan on painting it within the next week. For now, I'm focusing on Cygnar again in preparation for this upcoming tournament. I managed to play a game with pStryker on Thursday and my woes with the warcaster continued. He's great and all, but I'm not sure I'm playing him as aggressively as I should. I normally don't do this, but I think I'm going to change up my decision to play with pStryker in the tournament on Sunday. Like I said, I normally would strongly discourage this, but since I can't seem to align myself with Stryker's playstyle, I instead think that I will replace him with a warcaster that will probably better fit my style naturally. It might totally backfire on me since I've never played with his replacement before, but I think her playstyle will better match my own and require less of a learning curve than if I continued to play with pStryker. It's with a heavy heart that I must admit, I'll be playing with pHaley. I know. I'm the guy who keeps saying I think she's overrated, but I think in this case, she'll be a good alternative. Let me explain.
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Woldwrath preliminary thoughts
The stats for the Woldwrath were spoiled on the forums a few weeks before the No Quarter issue was officially released. Some individuals had their own copies in advance for some reason, so I've had some time to reflect and collect my thoughts on the highly anticipated Circle Gargantuan. While some mock the appearance of the Woldwrath (notably it's massive shoulder blades), it's technically the oldest of the gargantuans since we've had pictures of it from the original Iron Kingdoms RPG, before Warmachine even existed! I'm eager to purchase my own model and I wish I could justify spending the money right now to have a friend pick it up for me from Gencon. I've already commented on the viability of Gargantuans, in general, and specifically with the Mountain King, so where does that leave the Woldwrath? It has some of the same challenges which face the Mountain King but it also has some different ones. Let's take a closer look.
Monday, August 13, 2012
pStryker and the Stormwall
I've been playing around with the Stormwall for some time now. While the model is hardly rare on the tabletop anymore, it's most often seen with either of the Haleys, despite having some solid synergies elsewhere. Frequenters of my blog know that I've had great success with the Stormwall under Sloan and I think I've finally found a comfortable list with her, but I've been searching for a 2nd list to run next to her, and I think I've come back to Commander Stryker, with whom I've had some great success at tournaments so far. One of the features of the list, of course, is the Stormwall and pStryker has some solid synergy with the Colossal that many will often overlook. Today I will breakdown why I love the Stormwall so much with the often underrated pStryker.
Thursday, July 26, 2012
Steamroller Prep: 35 points
There's a 35 point Steamroller this Saturday at Pandemonium in Cambridge, MA. While I've known about this event for a couple of weeks now, I actually forgot about it until last week when my fiancee reminded me (she's the best!). We weren't sure if we were going to make it but since she wants to see her best friend in Boston this weekend anyway, I get to play in the tournament! Hooray! So today I'm going to look at my two favorite options again to see what I want to bring with me. I learned some lessons at the NETT and I want to re-evaluate my options. Naturally, I think I'll bring my Circle to this tournament just because they're my best faction. I've been trying to give my Cygnar some experience too, but I'm not ready to bring them to a tournament yet. I might play some games with Cygnar today just for some practice, but I'm 80% sure that I'll bring my Circle. There are two warlocks that I want to playtest, if possible, before the event on Saturday so hopefully I can get some games in tonight at the Battle Standard. Who am I considering?
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
List Building: Goats! Er, Satyrs!
Friday, July 13, 2012
NETT: Cygnar Debriefing
So this week has been chock-full of playtesting for me with my Cygnar in preparation for the New England Team Tournament. I posted on Tuesday the lists that I was considering bringing for my Cygnar and I've been practicing games with both lists to see how comfortable I'd feel with either of them. I haven't played at all with my Circle, and while that might seem like a bad idea in case I take them to the tournament, I actually have a lot of tournament experience with them already and since the lists will be exactly the same, I'm very confident with my performance with them. No, this week has been about playing with Cygnar to see what kind of damage I can do with them. Well, today I can share with you my conclusions about my Cygnar.
Thursday, July 12, 2012
Challenge Accepted: Making Cassius Work
As most of you already know, I am a contributor over at 3++ is the new black. For those who do not regularly check the site, it's mostly 40k-focused but Kirby has been expanding their Warmachine/Hordes content (and I help!). Well, with the recent release of 6th edition, they've been pretty 40k-crazed over there lately and I've personally been too busy to post for a while. Well, I've finally found some time to put up an article that's been on my mind since I started considering building a list for Cassius the Oathkeeper. He's often considered the worst among the Circle warlocks and my natural response was:
So I apologize for recycling the post here but I figured that those who don't regularly check 3++ might still be interested in reading my thoughts on making Cassius work.
So I apologize for recycling the post here but I figured that those who don't regularly check 3++ might still be interested in reading my thoughts on making Cassius work.
Wednesday, July 11, 2012
Tournament Prep: Circle or Cygnar? Part 2
The New England Team Tournament approaches! My teammates and I have been playtesting, sharpening our skills and refining our lists. We're feeling pretty confident, representing Legion and Menoth, but I'm still unsure of whether or not I want to bring my recently successful Cygnar or my confident Circle. Yesterday I shared the two lists that I'm considering for my Cygnar and I anticipate that I'll use either list in equal measure, depending on my opponents of course. So what lists am I considering using with my Circle? Well I'm once again considering my two old stand-by warlocks: pBaldur and pKrueger.
Thursday, June 28, 2012
35 Point Army Deals: Mercenaries
Today I want to continue my series on Summer Deals for those wishing to go beyond Privateer Press' 25 Point Summer Deals. While the deals they offer are nice, for those who are willing to spend a little more $$$ for effectiveness, I've decided to craft 35 point lists for each faction that I hope will both be a good starting point for building a collection with that army, while also being fairly effective and/or fun! Today I will be creating a list for Mercenaries (specifically, the Four Star Syndicate) that clocks in at only $221.88 retail. The added benefit here, of course, is that Mercenaries can be taken with other factions and so I purposely chose some models that I feel will both be effective and useful in other factions. Without further ado, let's look at the list, breakdown of cost, and briefly how one can use the list to be most effective!
Friday, June 15, 2012
Steamroller Prep: 25 points - Mercs
Today is the third and final part of my Steamroller Prep articles for the 25 point "Ambush" Steamroller event at The Battle Standard in Manchester, CT. I currently own 3 main factions right now: Cygnar, Circle, and Mercs and in the first two articles I discussed some lists worth considering for Cygnar and Circle. Today I wish to present the lists for my final faction: Mercenaries. Unfortunately, I only own a select few Mercenary models, and only 2 of them are warcasters, so my options are somewhat limited. The fortunate thing about owning Mercenary models, however, is the utility of using them in other factions as well, so it's a bit easier to build up a Mercenary collection on the side! In fact, many of the models that I'll be using in today's lists I picked up for their utility in other lists - notably for Cygnar. So what warcasters am I bringing? First is my favorite underdog: Fiona the Black.
Thursday, June 14, 2012
Steamroller Prep: 25 points - Circle
Like I mentioned yesterday, there will be a 25 point Steamroller tournament next weekend that I want to attend. One neat feature of this tournament is that every scenario will feature Reinforcements which will make it far more interesting and predictable when it comes to designing lists. I already shared two Cygnar lists worth considering (although I came up with another today that is so scary I want to keep it secret!) and today I wish to share two lists that I'm considering if I were to play Circle instead. One of the greatest advantages of playing my Circle is not only that I'm more familiar with them but that they are mostly painted - thus I can enter into the raffle easily! The two lists I'm considering from Circle will feature some models that have already been painted, but there will be some more that I would need to paint in order to be completely painted for this tournament, so I'd still be motivated to paint. What two lists am I considering bringing?
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
Steamroller Prep: 25 points - Cygnar
One of my long-time Warmachine/Hordes buddies has been the Press Ganger running events over at the Battle Standard for a few months now and, despite living in CT, I haven't made my way out there yet. I've been tempted to do so a number of times, but with a lease on my car and limited mileage, I have to be careful to keep track of how far I drive. This will change, however! There is a 25 point Steamroller tournament in less than 2 weeks that I think I want to attend since it's a good opportunity to get some guaranteed gaming in. What makes this tournament so interesting to me is twofold. First, it's an "Ambush" themed Steamroller where all of the scenarios will use Reinforcements and secondly, even if I don't win anything, if I can get my army fully painted then I will be entered into a raffle drawing. With this being summer vacation for me I could certainly use some motivation to get more models painted so this seems as good of an opportunity as any! So what lists am I considering taking? Well for the next three days I'll look at creating lists that I would feel comfortable bringing considering the factions I own/play. Today I'll start with the 2 lists I'm considering for Cygnar.
Thursday, June 07, 2012
List Building: Sloan and the Stormwall
I'm pretty excited about the Stormwall. I won't go as far as saying that it's the best Colossal, but I think it really has everything that Cygnar players have really needed and been waiting for. Ranged firepower? Check. P+S 20 on melee attacks? Check. Able to disrupt enemy warjacks? Check. There has been a lot of discussion in the community since the release of the Stormwall about which warcaster would benefit the most from it. Everyone seems to love pHaley with the Stormwall but on my own list I really tried to advocate for Kara Sloan. Perhaps my desire to make her my next Cygnar warcaster has led me to be over biased, but I really believe that she will benefit from the Stormwall more than most. Today, I want to look at Sloan in the context of the Stormwall and share a list that I think will probably have you intrigued.
Tuesday, June 05, 2012
List Building: Kromac and Mohsar 35 points
Last month's poll asked which of the Circle warlocks I should bring to the New England Team Tournament. While I'm still considering my options and haven't committed yet, I did say that the top 3 voted warlocks would at least get a list building article. The top 3 favorites for the NETT were: 1) Mohsar, 2) Kromac, and 3) pBaldur. Since I've written about list building with pBaldur before, so I'll spare you from yet another article on him, but I'll instead focus on Mohsar and Kromac. Since the tournament is 2 lists required, I'd need to bring both of these guys and have them cover all of the potential models I could see out there, and at 35 points it'll be even more challenging for Mohsar. I'll start with Kromac first.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








